[Federal Register: October 23, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 205)]
[Notices]
[Page 65092-65095]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23oc02-42]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. 2002-C-001]
Patent and Trademark Office Acquisition Guidelines (PTAG)
AGENCY: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed guidelines and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is
publishing a notice of the proposed guidelines which it will apply to
its acquisitions.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before November 22,
2002.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to: USPTO, Office of Procurement,
Washington, DC 20231. Electronic comments may be submitted to:
Mike.Anastasio@uspto.gov. Copies of all comments will be available for
public inspection at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/comp/proc/ or
in Suite 810, Crystal Park One, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia
22202, from 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m., Monday through
[[Page 65093]]
Friday. Please submit comments only and cite PTAG in all correspondence
related to this case.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Susan Messina, Procurement
Analyst, USPTO, Office of Procurement, at (703) 305-8014.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
a. On November 29, 1999, the President signed into law the Patent
and Trademark Office Efficiency Act (``USPTO Efficiency Act''), Pub. L.
106-113--Appendix I, Title IV, Subtitle G, 113 Stat. 1501A-572, which
took effect March 29, 2000. See 35 U.S.C. 1. The USPTO Efficiency Act
expressly provides that the USPTO ``shall retain responsibility for
decisions regarding the management and administration of its operations
and shall exercise independent control of its * * * procurements * *
*.'' To this end, the USPTO Efficiency Act expressly granted the USPTO
the authority to make purchases and to enter into contracts for
supplies or services without regard to the provisions of the Federal
Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (FPAS) (40 U.S.C. 471
et seq.). 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(4)(A). FPAS is also codified at 41 U.S.C. 251
et seq. The pertinent portions of FPAS from which USPTO is exempt are
found at 41 U.S.C. 251 et seq.
b. As relevant to the USPTO, the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) is issued by the Administrator of the General Services
Administration under the authority of FPAS. Because the USPTO is not
subject to FPAS, it is not required to follow the FAR.
c. On April 5, 2000, the USPTO published a Federal Register notice
stating that until otherwise indicated, USPTO will continue to follow
the FAR and Department of Commerce regulations applicable to the United
States Patent and Trademark Office. 65 Fed. Reg. 17,858-01 (2000).
d. Continuing to follow the FAR indefinitely will not permit the
USPTO to utilize the procurement flexibilities provided by the USPTO
Efficiency Act. On the other hand, the FAR contains procedures for
compliance with a large number of procurement-related statutes,
Executive Orders, and regulations to which the USPTO is still subject
and with which it must continue to comply. The FAR also ensures that
decisions are made fairly and in the best interests of the Government.
e. Accordingly, the USPTO will continue to use the FAR as guidance
in its acquisitions. This notice sets forth additional proposed
guidance concerning alternate procurement procedures that may be used
by the USPTO.
Nature of Proposed Guidelines
Neither the FAR nor the procedures set forth in this notice will be
binding on USPTO contracting officers or other USPTO employees involved
in the procurement process. However, USPTO employees may assume that
following either the FAR procedures or, to the extent applicable, the
alternate procedures set forth in this notice will ensure compliance
with applicable legal requirements and result in fair and appropriate
decisions. USPTO employees may use procedures other than those set
forth in the FAR and this notice so long as these procedures comply
with all applicable statutes, Executive Orders and regulations, will
further the legitimate interests of the USPTO and are calculated to
result in fair decisions.
Neither the FAR nor the alternate guidance provided in this notice
is binding on USPTO vendors or any other member of the public, except
to the extent provisions therefrom are incorporated in legally
enforceable contracts. Instructions set forth in solicitations or other
procurement documents are also binding in that they may establish
conditions on an offeror's continued participation in the procurement
process.
The alternate procedures set forth in this notice are intended to
incorporate brevity of content, streamlined procedures, innovation in
process, flexibility, and discretion to the acquisition process while
ensuring objectivity and maximum reasonable competition.
The following are highlights of the benefits the USPTO hopes to
achieve through this alternate guidance:
[sbull] Increase the competitive threshold from $2500 to $5000 to
decrease processing time and costs.
[sbull] Use ``maximum reasonable competition'' instead of ``full
and open competition'' for a more efficient procurement process.
[sbull] Reflect the USPTO's increased flexibility in procuring
printing services.
[sbull] Increase the threshold for the use of simplified
acquisition procedures for commercial items from $5 million to $10
million to reduce the lead time for processing requirements and
decrease acquisition costs.
[sbull] Provide guidance on the use of an Alternative Streamlined
Contracting Approach. This process involves the early identification of
highly qualified vendors, which will reduce the investment of vendor
time and resources, provide greater flexibility, and establish better
partnerships with the vendor community. The use of a pre-set number of
firms for the competitive range also reduces unreasonable contractor
expectations.
[sbull] Permit limited discussions after the establishment of the
competitive range in lieu of making an award without discussions. USPTO
hopes to reduce processing time and administrative burdens associated
with proposal revisions.
[sbull] Permit use of contract types not included in the FAR (i.e.,
contract types that combine elements of the various contract types
listed in the FAR (Labor Hour Award Fee, for one example). This
provides greater flexibility to improve mission accomplishment and
improved partnering relationships with vendors.
Proposed Guidelines
Expanded Use of Electronic Commerce
Recognizing that the Internet provides a valuable means of
disseminating information, USPTO intends to continue and expand its use
of electronic commerce to facilitate streamlining of the acquisition
process. While the USPTO will continue to synopsize proposed actions
and contract awards, the objective is to use the USPTO Office of
Procurement web site as the foremost method of publicizing
requirements, business opportunities, and providing procurement
information to the business community.
Competition
The USPTO will endeavor to acquire products and services to the
maximum extent possible in all acquisitions on a competitive basis;
however, it is exempt from the requirement to meet the test of ``full
and open competition'' as defined in FAR Part 6.
The USPTO will use competition as a principal tool in achieving
results and intends to adopt means of affording competition that it
determines will effectually serve the performance goals established for
particular acquisitions.
It is the policy of the USPTO to promote competition to the maximum
extent possible. Competition reduces the risk of having to rely on only
one source for critical goods or services and reduces costs. USPTO
intends to balance these considerations with the program benefits that
can be gained from developing a reduced supplier base and building
strategic alliances with its suppliers. The degree of competition
sought will be influenced by knowledge of the marketplace and
successful past performance records, with competition in most cases
limited
[[Page 65094]]
to a reasonable number of capable sources.
Under the USPTO process, all firms will be apprised of
opportunities, but only those judged to be the most viable will commit
the resources to fully participate. USPTO intends to have an open
interchange with industry about USPTO potential requirements and
contractor capabilities long before any formal solicitation is issued.
It is the policy of the USPTO to inform all firms of opportunities and
seek to ensure only the most viable will need to commit resources to
fully participate.
Where justifications for limiting competition are prepared, they
will be approved at the following levels:
a. Justifications of procurements $1,000,000 or less will be
approved by the Contracting Officer.
b. Justifications over $1,000,000 and less than $10,000,000 will be
approved by the Director, Office of Procurement.
c. Justifications greater than $10,000,000 will be approved by the
Agency Competition Advocate.
Simplified Acquisition Procedures
Competitive quotations need not be sought for purchases under
$5,000 provided that the Contracting Officer can readily determine the
price to be fair and reasonable. Written solicitations should only be
utilized when appropriate given the complexity of the requirement.
The USPTO contracting officer may use procedures similar to those
set forth at subpart 13.5 of the FAR for acquisitions of commercial
items not in excess of $10 million.
Alternative Streamlined Contracting Approach
The Contracting Officer may utilize the streamlined process
described below to solicit offers. The characteristics of this process
include:
a. Early identification of the most highly qualified contractors;
b. Establishing a pre-set number of firms for the competitive range
to limit the investment of contractor time and resources and to reduce
the administrative burden of the procurement process; and
c. Conducting negotiations only where it is practical and efficient
to do so and without the requirement for a common cut-off date for
concluding negotiations.
The USPTO intends to use a project team to conduct acquisitions
under the alternative streamlined contracting approach. The project
team will be a multi-disciplinary team that consists of a warranted
contracting officer, representatives from the program office whose
requirement is the subject of the procurement, the Office of Corporate
Planning, and the Office of the General Counsel. The project team will
possess the necessary authority needed to conduct all aspects of the
acquisition. No further approvals will be required to conduct the
acquisition.
The Alternative Streamlined Contracting Process is conducted as
follows:
a. A project team conducts all aspects of the acquisition.
b. The team employs strategies and methods that best fulfill the
needs of the acquisition.
c. When using the streamlined Alternative Streamlined Contracting
Approach, USPTO may employ announcements of opportunities rather than
announcement of individual actions over $25,000.
d. Initially, a high-level solicitation document is used. It should
solicit basic and essential information such as offeror qualifications,
broad-based product data, proposed technical concept, past performance,
and pricing. The solicitation document will typically consist of:
1. information on goals and objectives of the requirement,
2. specific procedures related to conducting the acquisition,
3. instructions to offerors on preparing a response,
4. information on how responses will be evaluated,
5. budget information on the value of the acquisition, where
appropriate, and
6. project and acquisition timeframes and schedules.
e. A competitive range will be established after initial evaluation
of responses. Respondents judged as not being among the most highly
rated will be eliminated from further consideration.
f. After establishment of the competitive range, a detailed
Statement of Need is issued to solicit additional information and
obtain a more complete offer from all firms. The Statement of Need will
incorporate the principles of performance-based contracting to permit
offerors the opportunity to propose the best solution to meet the
USPTO's needs.
g. Oral presentations may be used. The Contracting Officer should
maintain an adequate record of oral presentations.
Based on responses to the Statement of Need, the Contracting
Officer may negotiate or conduct discussions only with the highest
ranked offeror based on the evaluation factors set forth in the
solicitation. If the USPTO Contracting Officer is unable to reach
agreement with this offeror, negotiations will be initiated with the
next highest-ranked firm. This process will continue until those firms
remaining in the competitive range have been considered. If agreement
cannot be reached, negotiations may be reopened with all firms in the
competitive range or the solicitation may be canceled.
Selecting Contract Types
Where appropriate, the USPTO may use any contract type (e.g., fixed
price or labor hour) provided for in the FAR without regard to any
limitations specified therein, and in addition may use hybrid or other
contract types not provided for in the FAR.
Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
Because it is exempt from the FPAS, the USPTO is not required to
make multiple awards for indefinite-quantity contracts under any
circumstances, or, where multiple awards are made, to use any specific
procedures for placing task or delivery orders. Contracting Officers
are encouraged, however, to consider the use of multiple awards where
doing so would result in benefits to the USPTO. A solicitation
contemplating multiple awards should address the procedures the USPTO
will use for selecting between contractors when awarding task or
delivery orders. Where a specific procurement includes procedures for
seeking task or delivery order proposals from multiple contractors,
applying these procedures to individual requirements below $5,000
normally will not be in the best interest of the USPTO.
Options
Because of the USPTO's exemption from FPAS, it may make award on
the basis of unpriced options contained in an existing contract without
seeking further competition. The USPTO intends to consider the use of
this technique in connection with performance based contracting under
the following circumstances:
a. the award of additional option periods to the incumbent
contractor without competition is used as an incentive and reward for
good contract performance;
b. the solicitation notifies offerors that unpriced options will be
used as a performance incentive; and
c. the contract includes provisions for measuring contract
performance and the pricing, negotiation, and exercise of additional
option periods.
Acquisition Plans
Acquisition planning serves two important purposes: it establishes
how an agency will meet programmatic
[[Page 65095]]
requirements within the agency's budgetary goals and it serves as a
guideline for the acquisition.
Annual Acquisition Plans--As a means of funds control,
prioritization, and workload scheduling, USPTO intends to continue to
utilize yearly acquisition plans that are tied to the budget process.
The plans should be updated as priorities and funding changes occur to
ensure accuracy and currency. Plans will be concise. All planned
acquisitions for a given fiscal year should be included on the yearly
acquisition plan.
Separate Project Agreements--The USPTO may use a separate project
agreement for individual or multiple actions that utilize the
Alternative Streamlined Contracting Approach. Project Agreement
documents tailored to the size and complexity of the various
acquisitions will be developed.
Individual Acquisition Plans--The content of the individual
acquisition plan shall be left to the discretion of the Contracting
Officer. At a minimum, acquisitions plans should contain the following:
a. Statement of need.
b. Applicable conditions.
c. Cost.
d. Risks.
e. Plan of action.
f. Milestones.
Printing Requirements
The Patent and Trademark Efficiency Act, 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(4)(B),
exempts the USPTO from requirements for printing by the Government
Printing Office. Accordingly the USPTO intends to acquire printing by
the most economic and efficient means available, which may in
particular acquisitions include the Government Printing Office.
Market Research
The purpose of USPTO's approach to market research is to identify
and determine the availability of products or services that will
satisfy its requirements. The USPTO will use such research, as
appropriate, to help it ascertain the most efficient acquisition
strategy--with consideration of the range of potential sources,
availability of commercial items, and identification of standard
commercial practices. Accordingly, the USPTO intends to conduct market
research that, to the extent possible, is based upon clear statements
of an acquisition's intended outcome and does not foreclose, before
research is conducted, the consideration of any reasonable solution or
technology for accomplishing its goal. The best result of market
research will be achieved when there is a clear statement of the
acquisition's intended outcome.
Market research is the responsibility of the entire acquisition
team. USPTO Contracting Officers should work closely with technical/
program staff to ensure that appropriate market research is conducted.
The extent and results of market research efforts should be documented
in acquisition planning documents and/or project agreements when the
Alternative Streamlined Contracting Approach is utilized.
Bid Protests
The USPTO continues to be subject to the bid protest jurisdiction
of the General Accounting Office and of the Court of Federal Claims.
The USPTO is also subject to 6 Executive Order 12979 concerning
protests to the agency. Its procedures for considering such protests
are available at: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/comp/proc/
protest.htm.
Dated: October 17, 2002.
James E. Rogan,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 02-26968 Filed 10-22-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P